Exemplifying the Language and Content Learning, Cognitive and Social Benefits of Project-Based Language Learning Through a Mini-Research Project

URI http://cur-ren.cjc.ac.jp/metadata/803
Exemplifying the Language and Content Learning, Cognitive and Social Benefits of Project-Based Language Learning Through a Mini-Research Project
著者 Moritoshi Paul

The Project-Based Language Learning (PBLL) approach to the instruction, study and practice of foreign languages and course content requires students to work in small groups to complete an assignment over an extended period of time. To successfully complete the assignment students must apply target language and course content knowledge and skills as well as cognitive and social skills in a holistic, integrated and authentic manner. This paper exemplifies how the wide range of positive learning outcomes already associated with PBLL and documented in foreign language learning literature are elicited at various stages of a mini-research project conducted at Chugoku Junior College.

830 English
800 Language
Project-Based Language Learning
Language Knowledge and Skills
Content Knowledge and Skills
Cognitive Skills
Social Skills

1. Stoller F: Establishing a theoretical foundation for Project-Based Learning in second and foreign language contexts; in Project-Based Second and Foreign Language Learning: Past, Present and Future, Information Age Publishing, USA (2006) pp. 19-40.
2. Allen LQ: Implementing a culture portfolio within a constructivism paradigm. Foreign Language Annals (2004) 37 (2), 232-239.
3. Carter G and Thomas H: Dear Brown Eyes ―Experiential learning in a project-oriented approach. English Language Teaching Journal (1986) 40(2), 196-204.
4. Coleman JA: Project-Based Learning, transferable skills, information technology and video. Language Learning Journal (1992) 5, 35-37.
5. Ferragatti ML and Carminati E: Airport: An Italian version. Modern English Teacher (1984) 2(4), 15-17.
6. Fried-Booth DL: Project work with advanced classes. ELT Journal (1982) 36 (2), 98-103.
7. Gardner D: Student-produced video documentary privates a real reason for using the target language. Language Learning Journal (1995) 12, 54-56.
8. Gu P: Effects of project-based CALL on Chinese EFL learners. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching (2002) 12, 195-210.
9. Gu P: Tech view: Leaving the bathtub to make waves. Essential Teacher (2004) 1(4) 32-35.
10. Ho R: Project approach: Teaching 2nd Ed. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 478 224 (2003).
11. Lee I: Project work made easy in the English classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review (2002) 59, 282-290.
12. Legutke M: Project Airport: Part 1. Modern English Teacher (1984) 11(4), 10-14.
13. Legutke M: Project Airport: Part 2. Modern English Teacher (1985) 12(1), 28-31.
14. Levine GS: Global simulation: A student-centred, task-based format for intermediate foreign language courses. Foreign Language Annals (2004) 37(1), 26-36.
15. Padgett GS: An experiential approach: Field trips, book publication, video production. TESOL Journal (1994) 3(8), 8-11.
16. Sheppard K and Stoller FL: Guidelines for the integration of student projects into ESP classrooms. English Language Forum (1995) 33(2), 10-15.
17. Stoller F: Project work: A means to promote language and content. English Teaching Forum (1997) 35(4), 2-9.
18. Helgesen M, Brown S and Wiltshier J: English Firsthand Success. Pearson Longman, Hong Kong (2010).
19. Gillham B: Developing a Questionnaire. 2nd Ed, Continuum, London (2007).
20. Canale M and Swain M: Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics (1980) 1, 1-47.
21. Stern HH: The formal-functional distinction in language pedagogy: a conceptual clarification. Paper read at the 5th
AILA Congress Montreal, (August 1978) Mimeo.

Publish Date
Publication Title
Chugokugakuen journal
Start Page
End Page
Chugokugakuen University/Chugoku Junior College
Copyright Holders
Contents Type
Departmental Bulletin Paper
File Version